Regarding outcome of this research, some pointers can be made for additional strategies connected with dispute quality. For the associated literature, generally public skills degree (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), interaction and you may troubleshooting education (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; Enough time Adams, 2001) and behavioral means (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Energy, 1992) were chosen for education off disagreement solution. Yet not, cognitive behavioural treatment were good at ent off dispute resolution feel (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). This initiatives contributes that individuals can acquire way more satisfaction from their connections.
There are limitations and this determine generalization ones efficiency. Basic, the analysis is limited quantity of participant and attempt is recruited of students. For this reason, the fresh samplecan never be portray all of the adolescent. Second, parents-teenagers affairs was tested that with self-declaration measures and anly from adolescents’ angle. This tips can give minimal information about relations. Third, individuals’ perception in the loved ones was checked out certain duration of communication, not over the period.
Coming knowledge would be simulate the current investigation in addition to take to from individuals of individuals decades and you will community. Morever, mothers kids relationships will be analyzed using various methods instance videotaped otherwise head observation. Observational knowledge you may promote considerably more details in the especially family members and you may parents’ impression on the loved ones is viewed as when you look at the next studies. This research shall be frequent in certain periods in an excellent longitudinal studies which could bring a lot more realistic show.
Addis, J. Bernard, Yards. Age. (2002). Marital improvement and you may unreasonable viewpoints. Journal of Rational-emotive and you can Intellectual Behavioral Cures, 20, 3-13.
Akbalik, G. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the study regarding legitimacy out-of accuracy away from Argument Solution Level). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 16,7-thirteen
Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential results of gestalt a few-settee input and problem solving inside resolving desicional dispute. Record out-of Guidance Psychology, 33,11-15.
Further emotional input predicated on intellectual conclusion principle might be used to people to be attention to its with impaired relationship philosophy and its own unwanted effects on their argument solution processes and change its dysfunctional beliefs
Cramer, D. (2004). Effect of http://datingranking.net/nl/guardian-soulmates-overzicht/ the newest malicious values disgareement values towards the relationships satisfaction that have aromantic mate otherwise best friend. Therapy and you can Psychotherapy, 77, 121-133.
Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Predictions dyadic adjustment off standard and you may relationships specific opinions. Diary out-of Psychology, 130, 263-280.
DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Treatment of father or mother-adolescent conflict through behavioural techonology knowledge: example. Diary off Academic Mental Consultation, step 3,281-301.
DiGuiseppe, R. Zee, C. (1986). An intellectual emotive concept of relationship dysfunction and you will marital therapy. Record out of Rational emotive and you will Intellectual Behavioral Treatment, cuatro, 22-37.
Unlikely values out-of health-related couples: Its link to standard, specifications and you may fulfillment
Eidelson, Roentgen. J. Epstein, Letter. (1982). Cognition and dating maladjustment: Growth of a measure of impaired relationships values. Log away from Asking and you can Medical Mindset, fifty, 715-720.
Emmelkamp, P. G., Krol, B., Sanderman, R., Ruphan, Meters. (1987). The newest research out of matchmaking philosophy for the marital context. Identity and you will Individual Differences, 8, 775-780.
Epstein, Letter., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. A great. (1993). Treatments for relationship disagreement: a cognitive behavioral approach. Clinical Therapy Opinion, 13, 45-57.
Epstein, N., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Unreasonable beliefs and impression of relationship disagreement. Diary off Consulting and you may Systematic Psychology, 47, 608-610.
Epstein, N., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The latest part out-of cognitive appraisal from inside the thinking-reports off relationship correspondence. Behavior Cures, 18, 51-69.
Eryuksel, A beneficial. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin situation cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The investigation of family unit members family relations regarding problem solving, interaction experiences, cognitive distortion and you may relatives design). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished master thesis) Ege Univeristesi.