Additional information. ” Bellevue John Does 1-11 v. Bellevue Sch. Dist. (2008). 1B. Information that could be protected includes health information, marital status, disability, and reasonable accommodations. King County v. Sheehan (2002).
“Take to issues, scoring keys, and other test data used to give a licenses, a job, or educational test” is actually excused while the revelation will give an undue benefit to individuals to possess certificates or work.
Labels from applicants and their job software and accompanying information was excused. Find Beltran v. Dep’t Societal Health Features (1999).
City of Spokane (1993)
In the event that a candidate is hired, specific firms don’t consider this to be difference to utilize to that applicant’s information. As an alternative, the new firms seek out exemptions such as RCW (3) and RCW (3) to determine whether or not to redact information that is personal from all of these facts.
While doing so, all suggestions collected throughout the investigations by the businesses towards unjust work means or 
a position discrimination states are specifically stated are exempt when you’re men and women comparison are located in procedure
For public personnel, volunteers, and individual house health care specialists, so it part exempts their property addresses and you may phone numbers, personal phone numbers and you may emails, public protection and you can driver’s licenses or county identicard amounts, and you will emergency contact information. Because of their dependents, comparable info is excused except that times regarding beginning is actually added because the excused and you may driver’s license and you will identicard quantity are not detailed given that exempt. To possess personnel of criminal justice providers, their pictures and you will day and you can 12 months of birth also are exempt, unless of course asked because of the journalism. So it part is meant to include these types of teams from the culprit inhabitants, just like the revealed from the exemption about concept of news media regarding persons stored in the child custody ones businesses.
The latest law provides this different applies to guidance kept within the team and you may a career-relevant ideas. not, private emails away from area councilmembers familiar with carry out city team was in fact receive not to ever end up being excused, while they were not part of team records or employment-associated records. Mechling v. City of Monroe (2009).
Character off personnel trying to suggestions to determine its rights throughout the you are able to claims off discrimination against them are exempt whenever personnel ask you to the labels feel withheld; zero showing of a risk of harm needs as is required for criminal review. RCW (4). RCW (5).
The newest PRA exempts “intelligence pointers” and you can “certain investigative records” compiled by investigative, law enforcement, penology, and you will professional disciplinary companies in case the information is “important to energetic law enforcement” otherwise needed seriously to manage somebody’s confidentiality legal rights. “Specific . . . investigative ideas” are definitely the result of a study targeting a person, Laborers Int’l Partnership of United states, Regional Zero. 374 v. Town of Aberdeen (1982), or a study so you’re able to ferret aside criminal activity or even to missing light toward certain misconduct. Dawson v. Daly (1993); Columbian Posting v. City of Vancouver (1983); Town of Fife v. Hicks (2015). When the a law enforcement agency keeps account as an element of a great program administrative process, and never because of a specific complaint or allegation regarding misconduct, the fresh new reports are not investigative ideas inside the terms of which difference. Such as, “Access to Push Administrative Accounts” made by police of course, if there clearly was contact ranging from good K-9 product puppy and you may a person were held not during the investigative suggestions difference. Cowles Posting v.
“Investigative, the authorities, and you will penology providers” is actually firms with expert to research and you will punish, such as the cops, law enforcement internal activities analysis unit, people Revelation Payment, medical disciplinary chat rooms, or an area wellness service. An investigative company could possibly get exempt only those facts produced in its investigative mode. Columbian Posting v. City of Vancouver (1983) (a general inquiry to your company employees issues isn’t an enthusiastic “investigation” since contemplated from the PRA, regardless if it’s did by law enforcement officials).